Blog

About the book Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers

Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and ChallengersBusiness Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers by Alexander Osterwalder

Why is this book worth reading for?

  1. Because the book is greatly designed. But really.
  2. Because this book itself was published as a innovative business model. A book. How’s that possible?
  3. Because this book can easily change your life.

If you don’t believe me, read this review.

A description of a business model in the book says that a business model describes the rationale of how an organisation creates, delivers and captures value. Wikipedia adds to that that value could be economic, social, or in other forms of value. From the experience in this book I would add that in the first place there is a design thinking needed to generate business models because you have to combine rational and intuitive thinking. Design thinking.

If you would like to remember only one thing about or from this book, then remember: business model canvas. It has nine building blocs, left side presents the rationale and the right side presents the intuitive part. The canvas covers four main areas of business:

  • customers,
  • offer,
  • infrastructure, and
  • financial viability.

In business model canvas the intuitive or value-side is presented by: + customer segments, + customer relationships, + channels, and + revenue streams. The rationale or cost-side of canvas includes: +key activities, + key resources, key partners, and cost structure. Bost side are connected with value propositions.

You may freely download business model canvas at the business model generation web-site. So until know, you probably know that design approach or design thinking is necessary in every innovative, competitive, and/or growth business model. Authors of the book have proven it on the case of this book, that is also a management book of the year 2011 in Germany at least. Dan Roam’s has designed great visual presentation of the business model with the best visual approach I’ve seen, presenting all nine building blocks of building model canvas:

Dan Roam's visual presentation of business model canvas

SKETCH: DAN ROAM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In business model canvas you have already mentioned nine building blocks. On the left side you have so called rational: + key partners, + cost structure, and + key activities. On the right side you have: + customer segments, + customer relationships (excellently presented in Dan Roam’s sketch as ying:yang), and + channels. This is so called intuitive side. Both side are connected with the value propositions. The whole method demands therefore productive combination of rational and intuitive thinking, which is actually design thinking.

Business model canvas from businessmodelgeneration.com with icons from explaine

businessmodelgeneration.com, ICONS: XPLAIN

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What other details could be of interest to you? Really a lot of them. The book had really great impact on me. I even managed, with the help of my twitter profile and my followers to get to the Business models workshop and Masterclass held in Munich. I can really recommend this workshop to you too. If you are from a start-up company, you will usually have the options by achieving an amount of re-tweets from your twitter profile to get the workshop for just 1 €. Check-out Business Model Generation events web-site.

Business model patterns are moodel with similar characteristic or behaviour and include patterns such as: + Unbundling, + the Long Tail, + Multi-Sided Platforms, + Free, and + Open Business Models.

On the broad scale business models could be divided into cost driven vs. value driven but many business models fall in between these two extremes. Business models with

  • similar characteristics, or
  • similar arrangements of business model building blocks, or of
  • similar behaviours

are called business model patterns. Where it is worth knowing that a single business model can incorporate several of these patterns. Concepts described in this book include patterns such as: Unbundling, the Long Tail, Multi-Sided Platforms, Free, and Open Business Models. Every pattern is described with its context (before), challenge, solution (after), rationale, and really nice examples.

This part of the book helped me to find a way how to unbundle design services of my company. It is still very interesting to see the explanation of unbundling the business of mobile telecommunications firms, explained in the book on the cases of France Telekom, KPN and Vodafone. The author has mentioned also Bharti Airtel, one of the first mobile telcos that unbundled really in a strategic way, and is now one of India’s leading telcos focusing on its core competency: building Customer Relationships.

One other case was also very interesting, namely the transformation of the book publishing industry. Every author today has a possibility to publish his/hers book. Because the publishing business models have changed. While in the past the publishing houses had to decide if it’s profitable for them to copyedit, design, print and promote a book, today cost of self-publishing can be taken almost completely by the author with connection to publishing platforms like Lulu.com. And in case of failure nobody gets hurt (well, the self-esteem of the author, maybe).

Scheme of business model inovation by driven resources from Business model generation book

SKETCH: business model innovation by resources

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If you are going to try to sketch your business model remember: the entire business model design process should be guided from a customer perspective. The author calls it: it’s about THEM! Customer-centric business model design. It means shifting yours and everybody’s perspective away from YOU (as a organization or company). Away from organization-centric business model design. Just forget this perspective. Otherwise business model could also be:

  • resource-driven,
  • offer-driven,
  • customer-driven,
  • finance-driven,
  • multiple-epicenter-driven.

The entire business model design process should be guided from a customer perspective. It’s about THEM! Customer-centric business model design. It means shifting yours and everybody’s perspective away from YOU (as a organization or company). Go away from organization-centric business model design.

Once you have your business model canvas you have the opportunity to look at your canvas from the broader environment. You should or could include the key trends, market forces, macroeconomic forces and industry forces. Add some other details like your team, finance… and you have almost completed business plan. But first test your business model. And this is the greatest advantage of business model generation, you don’t need to make a whole plan to see or realize if your idea/product/service works or not.

One other very interesting connection is with the Blue Ocean Strategy concept. Especially when you are developing/designing your value proposition it could be very useful and efficient to use four actions framework of what to eliminate, what to reduce, which factors to raise in which to create new? Or use the empathy map to design or find your customer profile. What does the person feel, what does she see, what does she say and do, and what does she hear. Out of that you’ll be able to find out your customer profile pains and gains.

Blue ocean strategy sketch in business model canvas

SKETCH of blue ocean strategy in business model canvas

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You don’t have to be some serious manager to design a business model. Sometimes it’s even better if you are not one. Because ideation is the crucial art to be mastered if you are to design a viable new business models. At least a little bit of creativity is therefore needed and we all know managers are not really creative most of the time. Children could do much better.

To warm up before you start designing or generating your business model you may use the silly cow exercise. Here’s how it works:

“Instruct participants to sketch out three different business models using a cow. Ask them to first define some characteristics of a cow (produces milk, eats all day, makes a mooing sound, etc.). Tell them to use those characteristics to come up with an innovative business model based on a cow. Give them three minutes.

Keep in mind that this exercise can backfire, as it is indeed quite silly. But it has been tested with senior executives, accountants, risk managers, and entrepreneurs, and usually is a great success. The goal is to take people out of their day-to-day business routines and show them how readily they can generate ideas by disconnecting from orthodoxies and letting their creative juices flow.” Danny Beckett Jr.

Innovative business model is more important if you wish to succeed than your great idea, product or service.

Prototyping of your next business model could be done at different scales: from napkin sketch to simple or elaborated business model canvas or to the field test. Remember that your breakthrough ideas may encounter strong resistance. Either inside your organisation or outside in your environment. Don’t let that stop you. Remember, innovative business model is more important if you wish to succeed than your idea, product or service.

For big picture assessment you may use simple or detailed SWOT assessment of each building block of the business model canvas. So you should be able to:

  • first have a snapshot where are you now (strengths and weaknesses), and
  • second you should be able to realize some future trajectories (opportunities and threats).

You don’t need a lot of knowledge about business to start your idea, because every business model design project is unique, so build your business models ASAP.

View all my reviews

Tags: , , , , , , ,

About the book: The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business Is Selling Less of More

The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business Is Selling Less of MoreThe Long Tail: Why the Future of Business Is Selling Less of More by Chris Anderson

My rating: 4 of 5 stars

Google was influenced by the theory presented in this book. Originally the Author Chris Anderson presented it as a article in the magazine Wired, as Editor in Chief. And Google was back then in 2001 “just” the fastest growing search engine on the planet. For the record, Google borrowed the business model that was pioneered by Bill Gross few years earlier. And Google has built the most affective Long Tail advertising machine the world has ever seen. And if only because of that this book is worth reading.

In short: Long Tail is “market” of millions of markets of dozens. Where market could be anything. Also something that author refers to like: “all-amateur, laptop culture”. Not written by the author of this book, but mentioned as the perfect example of Long Tail is on Wikipedia written definition of Long Tail.

Bottom line: a Long Tail is just culture unfiltered by economic scarcity. So, our culture is moving from a relatively small number of hits toward a huge number of niches in the tail. And this is what author explains in depth. Some cases being really interesting especially if you are not from USA but would like to learn something new about past decades in the States.

What enabled the Long Tail?
+ democratization of the production tools,
+ falling costs of consumption by democratized distribution,
+ connection between supply and demand.

Some more interesting details to me.
Internet is about filtering. And we had filters even in pre-online times. Just we didn’t notice them. Author divides filters into pre-filtes and post-filters. Cases for the first are: editors, record label scouts, studio executives, department store buyers, marketers, advertisers and cases for the later are blogs, playlists, reviews (like this ones on Goodreads), customers, recommendations, consumers. In Long Tail all you need are effective filters. You should be able to find what you want as you move down the Tail to your “nichebusters” (by Eric Schonfeld).

Very interesting to me author also explains or better to say de-constructs some other generally accepted theories or rules. Like 80/20 Rule of Pareto/Zipf distributions. In economy this rule is used to explain that 20 % of products account for 80 % of revenues. Or more generally that 20 % of our time accounts for 80% of our productivity. Originally Pareto observed and calculated that in his times about 20 % of population owned 80 % of the wealth. And what has Long Tail to do it? Nothing. Just don’t be discouraged by this rule because the Long Tail does work. Because we live in online era where different (economic) rules apply. If you sold Top 20 ring-tones for 80 % of sales in the newspaper era, this felt to just 40 % of sales when users could search online from nearly 20.000 ring-tones online.

Others Long Tail ideas:

  • cool commercials you choose to watch
  • presentations from conferences you wish you could have attended
  • self-publishing market with BookSurge as leading print-on-demand business
  • self-publishing as marketing vehicles to enhance your academic reputation, market your consultancy or earn you speaking fees or just leave your mark on the world
  • services that aggregate only SEC filings

And did you know that ontology is a word that means different things in different disciplines?

View all my reviews

Tags: , , ,

What business are you/we in? Classic advice from Theodore Levitt essays

Theodore Levit was born in Germany. He published his famous article Marketing Myopia in 1960. Still more then valid today in 2011.

What business’ are railroads in? In a railroad business? No. In a transportation business. It is very important to define your business correctly. Otherwise other will take your customer away. I guess because railroads do not understand that in full degree they are more often than not in trouble. And this claim is still valid no mater what new technologies or products/services arrive.

How to approach to the definition of your business?

First realizing that company’s most precious assets is its relationship with its customers. “What matters is not whom you know but how you are known to them.”

Second: if you are lucky enough that your business is in expanding market you should be aware of absence of thinking on defining your business. In either case you should always think how to expand the market of your business. Seeing that as a problem is great because if “thinking is an intellectual response to a problem, then the absence of a problem leads to the absence of thinking. “. So, management must not think of itself as merely providing products and/or services but as providing customer-creating value satisfaction.

Third. What does that mean for my specialized B2B design business? Specializing in integrated corporate reports design is only one side of this business. Corporate reporting has some similar touch points as publishing in general. But it is also specific. It is consisted of:

  • audit or compliance with some standards. Financial standards are well known. Other, such as Global Reporting Initiative are yet to be widely accepted.
  • design including the redaction of the content. This is the part that my company is able to cover well, as classical publication and completely as online presentation.
  • publishing itself. Also very interesting point, especially because there is a growing interest not only in annual but also in corporate social responsibility (CSR) and sustainability reports.

So, service provider who will be able to cover all three aspects of reporting business will be the winner of the future. In my opinion.

Last but not least. If you are advertising agency. What business are you in? Advertising? No! As well presented in a cartoon by DDB, you are in de-commodification business.

Illustration from ddb.com on what business is advertising agenncy in?

Illustration by ddb.com

Source: What Business Are You In?: Classic Advice from Theodore Levitt by Theodore Levitt 1 pages. Publication date: Oct 01, 2006

Tags: , , , ,

What can design do for you?

“What design actually can do, it can solve problems on a case-by-case basis around the world. As it does that, it changes the world, because it changes the reality for people wherever the situation is happening. If design can change water delivery in a certain part of the world, then it changes that part of the world for those people. That’s the way design changes the world.” by Warren Berger, Bruce Mau in Glimmer: How Design Can Transform Your Life and Maybe Even the World.

Photo of Warren Berger and Bruce Mau at the Glimmer book presentation

by Bruce Mau Design

Tags: , , ,

About the book: Funky Business Forever. How to enjoy capitalism.

Funky Business Forever: How To Enjoy CapitalismFunky Business Forever: How To Enjoy Capitalism by Kjell Nordstrom

My rating: 5 of 5 stars

Funky Business Forever. How to enjoy capitalism. Third edition published in 2008.

This book primarily aims at leaders. But I guess it is going to be very interesting reading for all others who work in business too (because we can’t be all leaders, right?). And maybe this book will be of interest to all of you who like to follow new phenomenas in modern economies and societies in general. Believe me there is plenty of advice for everybody and especially for all of us who are making our own money for living. Be that in your own company or in the multinational corporation or in public organization for which you work for.

The fact is that 12.5 years is a life expectancy of all firms in Europe and Japan. So, to discover the fountain of youth for your organization you should focus on human community inside and outside your company rather than on profits and bottom line.

Mission of this book, for which it is really hard to say that it is only a business book, is to: “make a difference in shaping organizations and leaders who consider broader responsibilities than the balance sheet.”. You will find some incredebly funny or better to say funky statements. If you have finished an MBA, that means only that you (or in that case me, myself and I) are Mediocre But Arrogant (MBA). So read this book or maybe this review if you want to find out why an MBA in todays (business) environment is just not enough.

Todays new phenomenas are described in more details in the book. To me it was interesting to read the opinion about phenomena #11: Interactive everything. Besides new phenomenas authors also claim that technology opens up more markets and more things than ever before to total transparency and increased globalisation. There is a claim that we need to realise that technological development necessitates changes in our institutions and in our values. Technology. Institutions. Values.

So, but what is the most important concern every big company (or for that sake, every company) should have? The fact is that 12.5 years is a life expectancy of all firms in Europe and Japan. And as much as one-third of 1970′s Fortune 500 companies had disappeared by 1983. (de Geus) So, to discover the fountain of youth for your organization you should focus on human community inside and outside your company rather than on profits and bottom line. That kind of company is so called Funky Inc.

In Funky Inc. people work smarter. They do what they are really good at, maybe 100 times better. In another words: the more unique you are – the better you will do.

Authors describe Funky Inc. in depth and I would also like to share with you some interesting details. We are all more or less in so called knowledge society/economy. And a combination of fun and fear drives knowledge workers to 80-hour work week. The distinction between learning, working and living is gone – it is one and the same thing. But funky people in Funky Inc. work smarter. They do what they are really good at, maybe 100 times better. Period. In another words: the more unique you are – the better you will do.

Funky organizations do not aspire to be everything for everyone. Instead, they try to become something for someone. This focus has three elements:

+ Narrow Focus (NF)
+ Hollow Focus (HF)
+ Targeted Focus (TF)

NF = only the best is good enough.
HF = competing based on core competence and compents, the people who make things happen. But remember that your psychological capital (confidence, hope, optimism and resilence) is more important than your intellectual capital (education and experience).
TF = find riches in niches.

Worth remembering is that great organisations are based on fantasy, feelings and faith. To achieve that you need intellectual capital + psychological capital + social kapital.

Funky Inc. also thrives on variation, difference and diversity. C (creativity) = D (diversity)2. More diversity means more standard deviation. Variation => if many of your customers are imigrants or young or old or women, this should be reflected in the make-up of the organzation; this is so called an eve-olution. Frozen creativity means that we get an idea (gas); then start discussing it with others (fluid); and finally develop a customer offering (solid). So, remember that no one can have a monopoly on creativity – not even a momentary one – not even Microsoft or Google. Managing across borders that you could find funky is in European firms such as: Phillips, Electrolux, Nokia, Heineken, Unilever, TetraPak, Nestlé rather than companies as Wall-Mart or Mitsubishi.

To build up your funky organization you should focus, focus, focus and then go global. In your communications and in your believes you should reffer to niches rather than temporary monopolies – though the meaning is exactly the same. Vision of your organisation should be clear, continuous and consistent. It should inspire commitment and be continually communicated. Funky leaders communicate, then communicate the same thing againg, and again, and again (this is one particular thing I should really remember). The true leaders are CSOs – Chief Storrytelling Officers. Four critical requirements of funky leaders will arise: increased calls for direction and tolerance, attraction and attention. And in all companies they should understand that intelligence is normaly distributed. It is not the preserve of white, 45-year-old males.

In funky companies sharing includes: ownership, rewards, identity, culture, knowledge, attitudes; the choice is endless, actually. But the trick is in keeping one thing constant while at the same time you allow for variation in all other dimensions. Funky Inc. learns from chinese economy which is built on the conept of trust – Guanxi – a strong and inexpensive substitute for contracts and lawyers. To achieve a funky oraganization you most have the gifts and guts to imagine and work wonders. All this implies risk – total risk – and, at the end of the day, personal risk. Yes, personal risk. When you wake up next day remember yourself that business is not a rocket science. It basicaly still boils down to making money. Also in Funky Inc.

If we look back, we could realise that since the fall of the Berlin Wall we have the Capitalism über alles. The nation state is stucked. To small to make an impact on the big issues and too big to make an impact on the small issues.

What about phenomenas in society more in general? If we look back, we could realise that since the fall of the Berlin Wall we have the Capitalism über alles. And in the 21 century instead of 500 TV channels, we now have millinons of websites. (Time magazine) Family became a luxury item… For many of us the de facto standard is already serial monogamy, threesomes, etc. The nation state is stucked. To small to make an impact on the big issues and too big to make an impact on the small issues. The dominant ism left on earth is individualism. We have become wandering vagabonds in search of who knows what.

The fact is that rich are getting richer and the poor poorer. We are on the way toward a 2/3 type of society in which a large proportion of people are constantly loosing ground. Parents from young people had a stedy job in their times in a big organisation where you got a gold watch and a pat on the back after 40 years of loyal service. Old societies were geographically structured and so were the tribes. We had the Sydney tribe, the Stuttgart tribe and the Stockholm tribe. And today? What is today’s way to progress?

Wealth is not gained by perfecting the known. Innovation conerns every little asspect of how an organisation or a society for that matter operates – administrative innovations, marketing innovations, financial innovations, HRM innovations and service concept innovations. Europe’s advantage is supposed to be: diversity because it is the mother of creativity, invention and progress at the end. Todays reality is that employees education isn’t growing 100 per cent faster than academia, but 100 times or 10.000 per cent faster. So academia and the whole educational system will have to adapt, I guess.

For the end of this review three other interesting details to me:
1.
The most staggering thing is that in a world on real-time society, companies keep on publishing Annual Reports. The balance sheets are about atoms – machines, buildings, etc. – but do companies that way really capture the most critical assets by measuring that stuff?
2.
Can you tell a bank from an insurance company? They basically provide the same kind of service. My experience exatly. Even more, who needs a bank anymore today?
3.
The key to increase internal leverage is not knowledge management but rather knowledgeble management. So how do you implement that in a small design boutique? My challenge for the future.

I hope you enjoyed my review. Let me know what do you think in comments or on twitter: marko_savic_. Go Funky.

View all my reviews

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

About the Kristina Halvorson’s book: Content Strategy for the Web

Content Strategy for the Web (Voices That Matter)Content Strategy for the Web by Kristina Halvorson

My rating: 4 of 5 stars

The most important thing I realised, when I read this book is:
You are on the web => You are publisher.

Well the author said that if you or your organization has a web site, then you are a publisher but I guess my claim could also hold in this web 2.0 times (or are we already 3.0?). One other thing to keep in mind is that this is not a book about web writing. It’s about content strategy – for the web.

Content strategy consists of: + creation, + delivery, + governance.

This book more specifically deals with:
+ how to plan the content strategy;
+ how to create a content but don’t expect to learn how to write for your web site;
+ governing the content.

The whole book is written with the presumption that you/your organization is already on the web or has a web site. Which seems like a must today for everybody. So if we follow the most important thing to remember from this book, about being a publisher, this means that everybody today already is a publisher. I guess that’s not far away from the facts. And if you are a publisher and want to be successful publisher, you need a content strategy. This book definitely helped me to rethink my own blog and about my company’s web content.

If I already talk about a web site, to me it was interesting to realize, that a mid-sized web site was one that has 200 to 1.200 pages. And inside such a web site for example it is pretty straightforward clear that you should develop your linking strategy. Or will you use automated linking service like Zemanta, for example?

When delivering content, we have options to choose between:
+ original content,
+ aggregated content,
+ co-created content,
+ licensed content,
+ user-generated content.

And I was impressed to realise how many people profiles could actually be engaged in content creation. The list of profiles is:
+ content requesters,
+ content providers,
+ content creators,
+ content reviewers,
+ content approvers,
+ content publisher.

And if it that is not enough, once your web site is live you could need profiles like:
+ web editor-in-chief,
+ web editor,
+ web writer,
+ search engine optimization strategist,
+ reviewers and approvers.

From the numerous profiles above it is clear that copy is not content. In content creation there are numerous profiles involved. And author goes further in claiming that user experience (UX) design is not the answer to a successful web site but the collaboration across disciplines. That, in my opinion is the reason why this is not such an easy task, actually.

Content strategy vs. brand strategy?
+ Content strategy is not about the talk.
+ Content strategy is about how you walk the talk.
+ Messages from your brand strategy are not content.

For some professional, be that marketing, communications or other it might be interesting to realise where content strategy stand when compared to brand strategy. Well content strategy is not about the talk. It’s about how you walk the talk. And messages from your brand strategy are not your content.

Take your social media efforts like a commitment not like a campaign. So, stop thinking “launch”. Start thinking “life-cycle”.

There is one other news to have in mind when you have a web site. Your content is never really finished. Sorry, says author of this book, Kristina Halvorson. And one other piece of advice. Take your social media efforts like a commitment not like a campaign. So, stop thinking “launch”. Start thinking “life-cycle”. I couldn’t agree more.

And for almost a gig like me it was interesting to see two diagrams. One is: How to measure content effectiveness? Diagram was developed at the Content Delivery & Analysis Ltd:
Diagram on content effectiveness

Content is not a feature. It should be noticed that content needs ongoing care and feeding. Web content is never actually really finished.

For the end of this review only one remark from the author. If your are some kind of web professional, you probably saw a diagram the Elements of user experience. Well I didn’t. And the author recommends to not think of content as a feature as maybe it could be said from this diagram, originally developed by Jesse James Garrett.
description

View all my reviews

Enhanced by Zemanta

Tags: , , ,

Corporate thinking: How to find a perfect job? By following the “Cycle of Excellence” or by following principles of the “Managing oneself”?

Corporate thinking: How to find a perfect job? By following a “Cycle of Excellence” or by following principles of “Managing Oneself“?

At the end of the year or at the beginning of the new year, thinking about the new job or even a new career is very popular and reasonable at the same time. A lot of changes is happening at that time. And we like to make our own balance sheets or cost to benefit analysis about our work and career. I guess that’s also the reason why the January 2011 issue of Harvard Business Manager (HBM) was featuring the theme “Karriere”.

One of the articles in that January 2011 issue of the HBM has a great title: The path to the perfect job (in German it is: Der Weg zum perfekten Job). I must say I couldn’t find the proposed path very useful in real life. I just couldn’t imagine myself being able to follow it. Mainly because in my opinion I think the results by following this path would be minimal if there were any. But, I could be wrong also.

I’ll try to present the main point of the Cycle of Excellence that is presented in this article The path to the perfect job. And at the same time I am going to try to present the better alternative in my opinion. That better alternative in my opinion is coming out from a small but classic book from Peter F. Drucker: Managing oneself.

Photo of Peter F. Drucker

Peter F. Drucker via www.churchleadergazette.com

[height]50[/height]
In short five steps of Cycle of Excellence are:

  1. Carefully choose your tasks
  2. Nurture contacts with your colleagues
  3. Work playfully
  4. Find your big challenge
  5. Enjoy in accomplishments

And my short version of Managing oneself in three directions consists of:

  • Do not plan. Be prepared.
  • Take responsibility for your relationships.
  • Are you a reader or a listener?

Short explanation of the Cycle of Excellence

The theory comes from a question that I’m sure every one of ask has asked himself. To have a feeling you are in the wrong place. And the author of the article The path to the perfect job, Edvard M. Hallowell, says that this question could spread around some company like a virus infection. So, it is better to take this question seriously. No matter the side your are on.

Five steps of Cycle of Excellence:
1. Carefully choose your tasks
2. Nurture contacts with your colleagues
3. Work playfully
4. Find your big challenge
5. Enjoy in accomplishments

In the first step of the Cycle of Excellence: Carefully choose your tasks, you are supposed to ask yourself what do you like to do? What are you best in? And with what are you able to gain the added value for your company? This are all very good questions in my opinion. But I am not really convinced that by asking yourself this question you’ll make any difference to your career or to your company. There is also proposed 15 questions questionnaire that is supposed to help you. Maybe. I was not convinced.

Nurture contacts with your colleagues. This is the second step in this theory that should follow the first one. If I understood this theory right. Yes, it is true that in this days a lot of people working in the same building communicate only trough e-mail or other technologies. And that this colleagues sometimes do not see each other for months or longer. Alienation is a fact. And that could have serious consequences for every company, yes that is true also. And it is true that leader of the company have a responsibility to take care of good relationships between people. And it is also true that real connection between colleagues between people is a win-win situation. But I have real problems in seeing what does this has to do with your question of finding a perfect job? Let’s see the third step.

Work playfully. The author says that in the Southwest Airlines there is a saying: People are rarely successful at things with with they do not have fun. So first you should find what your good at. Then be nice and friendly to your colleagues. And then somehow you’ll start to be more satisfied. And then start to work playful. That is the suggestion, I guess. I have real difficulties in accepting that. And then if your boss is trying to stop you working playfully you have to convince him that this is also good for your company. Even if that would be true, I still think a lot of your bosses wouldn’t buy the argument. I had opportunity to know many people who had finished the studies in economics and at their sales jobs they had to do really stupid things, like reporting what they business calendar consisted of every weak. So, I just do not see how could somebody convince such a boss that this is not a thing were somebody could use his creative abilities or the knowledge and experience from the studies and years of working in sales, for example. But let us see the next four step. Again this step should follow the third step.

Find your big challenge is the next fourth step. When you mastered the first three you should find something really difficult to achieve. Accelerate the so called positive stress. When you achieve that or overcome your challenge you will feel really happy. Yes, true. But I somehow doubt that a lot of people has the opportunity for their big challenge at their work. But like I said, maybe I’m wrong.

Three main features of the Cycle of Excellence:
+ scientifically based theory
+ proposed cases unrealistic in real life
+ demands successive approach

And the last fifth step is following the first four steps. And for me this is the most inappropriate one. When you accomplished something big, like found and master your big challenge explained in the worth step, you should wait for the acknowledgement from your colleagues. If nothing happens say something. You have good relationship with your colleagues, remember the step two? But if still nothing happens then consider finding a new job. Yeah, right. That’s a way to go. I just do not buy this theory. What would be a better approach in my opinion?

Short explanation of the Managing oneself

I will propose my short version of the Managing oneself. Anybody interested in more details can read more in the same called book that contains only 57 really small pages, so you can read it in less than an hour.

The biggest advantage of Managing oneself in my opinion is its possibility to approach to it in an asynchronous way. That means it is not important what you do first. Or what you do last. Just do something out of it, no matter what have you picked. Pick something that you are most familiar with. See if it suits you and go further. So, I’ll try to explain in a non-chronological manner.

Three directions approach of the Managing oneself:
+ Do not plan. Be prepared.
+ Take responsibility for your relationships.
+ Are you (or your boss) a reader or a listener?

Do not plane. Be prepared. One of the important claims of Peter F. Drucker is that successful careers are not planned. You should be prepared for opportunities. Maybe you are a school teacher for ten years know and if you have invested in this years in your leadership strengths, it’s very likely you’ll be an excellent principal of your school.

If you know your method of work, and even more important if you know hoy your boss or bosses are functioning there is no doubt you’ll be successful to move a step further in your career when the opportunity arises. And if you know what are your values you will not have a difficult job to find out if your values are compatible with the values of your organisation or company. Yours and yours company do not have to match completely but is is appropriate that they are close enough together. Knowing all that: strengths, your method of work (and your boss’s), and your values could transform you to an outstanding performer. And you can start with every aspect of the preparation that is mentioned here right now. I’m sure it will be worth it.

Take responsibility for your relationships. You should ask everyone with whom you work the following questions: what do I need to know about your strengths, how you perform, your values, and your proposed contribution? This are important questions we should ask ourself s. If your are a leader to other people. Or if you are a beginner and just started working in some company. This four questions are a baseline from where you are able to make a relationship with your colleagues. And how do you communicate with them is really a matter of technique. If you seat with somebody at the same table and chat with him at the same time. So what. If both of you like it. There is no problem of alienation.

It is important that you repeat these questions (strength, performance, values, contribution) every year once with your colleagues in both direction. In that way you’ll get priceless feedback information. Be strict with that rule. And then you are at the same time on your very good way  to take responsibility not only to take responsibility for your relationships but also to be prepared for your next career or the next step in your existing career.

Are you a reader or a listener? This sounds like a simple question. But maybe it is not so simple. Usually one can not be both. Maybe some of you will say, yes sometimes I’m a reader and sometimes I’m listener. Naturally. But in general, to process professional information we are only one thing. I think it is very important that everybody founds out what he is. A reader or a listener. Because one can train himself to listen to the people when they are saying or explaining something but if you know that you make best decisions based on a written information this is the way or method of work you should demand from your colleagues.

Let’s say you are a managing director of a small health care centre. Doctor of medicine otherwise. There comes a young paediatrician to discuss the possibilities of working at your centre. Although you know you talk a lot a the meetings, so other people usually don’t get much chance to say something, you know you are a reader actually. Wouldn’t it be a smart idea to ask this young paediatrician to prepare a short written offer of his demands to work at you centre? In that way you can easily read these demands in that meeting. And immediately decide if you have the possibility to negotiate about these demands further or rather leave these paediatrician (and your centre) find another opportunity?  I think this is a very smart move for both sides.

Three main features of the Managing oneself:
+ based mainly on experience
+ real life and easy to understand cases
+ possible to apply in a asynchronous manner

Other things besides considering if you are a reader or a listener are also:

  • How do I learn? By listening and reading or by writing? Or by doing? Or hearing yourself talk (usually to others).
  • And not lest: Do I work well with people or am I a loner? And there are the other questions like: Am I a decision maker or an adviser? Do I perform well under stress? Do I work best in a big organization or in a small one?

All in all, in short I think with the Managing oneself directions or principles every one of us has a lot better chances to find a perfect job. So, you and I should just go for it. Especially if you are a knowledge worker (and there are chances that you are) start thinking and behaving like a chief executive officer.

Sources:
Peter F. Drucker: Managing Oneself, Harvard Business Review Classics
Edward M. Hallowell: Der Weg zum perfekten Job, January 2011

Enhanced by Zemanta

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

The way out of financial crisis in three simple steps by Joseph L. Stiglitz

The photo of J. E. Stiglitz at the speech

Joseph L. Stiglitz

This one is really simple. A Nobel laureate explained in a short and clear manner what is to do to overcome financial crisis. In an article in a special Newsweek edition December 2010-February 2011.

First.
“The financial crisis taught us that markets, by themselves, may be neither self-correcting nor efficient.”

In three simple steps J. E. Stiglitz shows the way out of the financial crisis that taught us that markets, by themselves, may be neither self-correcting nor efficient. Public investment spending (and not pumping cheap money into the economy) will increase GDP-and tax revenues-in both the short term and the long. And there may be a large “multiplier” effect of public investment spending.

Second.
Public investment spending (and not pumping cheap money into the economy)will increase GDP-and tax revenues-in both the short term and the long.

And third.
There may be a large “multiplier” effect of public investment spending.

Although this is the for the USA, I guess a lot of other government policies could head up in that direction.

Source: Joseph. E. Stiglitz: The way out of debt? Spend. Spend. Spend. in Newsweek, December 2010-February 2011

Enhanced by Zemanta

Tags: , , , , ,

Why do firms exist, anyway?

Why do firms exist, anyway?

The Economist published great article. Why do firms exist? In some other place I read once that the company the customers would miss the most is BMW.

The article was honouring the Nobel prize winner for economy, Ronald Coase.

The photo portrait of Ronald Coase

Ronald Coase via The University of Chicago Law School

From the article I learned three things:

  • Mr. Coases theory of “market failure” explains why highly diversified business groups in emerging markets succeed -like India‘s Tate Group and Turkey‘s Koc Holding.
  • On the other hand the neo-Coases school argues that firms succeed also because they can marshal a wide range of resources – including such nebulous as “corporate culture” and “collective knowledge”.
  • And I would like to add one other thing. Michael Porter was not arguing for the business diversification quite the opposite. But he had long time ago admitted that a strong sense of corporate identity is as important as slavish adherence to business units’ financial results if a corporate strategy is to be successful. And corporate culture is an important part of corporate identity.

Sources:
The Economist, December 18th, 2010. Web post available at:
http://www.economist.com/node/17730360
M. Porter in Harvard Business Review, 2001: From competitive advantage to corporate strategy.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

What have I learned from “Pausenzeichen” – a story on Stefan Sagmeister in brand eins?

The November, 2010 issue of brand eins has a leading theme “learning to forget”. One of the article is also about Stefan Sagmeister and his sabbatical that developed into a project and a book: Things I learned in my life so far. There was also a believe a series of the lectures on the subject, one of them also in Ljubljana.

The first lesson for me starts with the idea of the sabbatical. Mr. Sagmeister had a plan to do it every seven years for a year. And he did it. In 2000. And in 2007. But know he is doing it every year for three months. I think this is much better approach. For me even that approach is difficult to follow though. One little remark from this lesson. How did clients from Mr. Sagmeister react when he tolled them he will not be available for a year? In general very positive, but the winner is definitely Lou Reed, who just simply postponed the release of his album for a year to wait for Mr. Sagmeister to come back.

The second lesson. When Mr. Sagmeister came back from his firs sabbatical he decided to do three things:

  • he will only work with clients he likes,
  • he will employ maximum three designer and two intern-ships, and
  • he doubled his prices.

Especially important to me seems that last action. Mr. Sagmeister need more the seven years to find the right pricing policy for his company. So never underestimate the prices in a design consultancy business. no mather which side are you on.

And the third is more an impression than a lesson. Mr. Sagmeister was supposed to be planning his days in sabbatical from 8:00 to 18:00 hours bi minute exactly. Respect.

Source: brandeins, November 2010, web article:
http://www.brandeins.de/archiv/magazin/vergessen-lernen/artikel/pausenzeichen.html

Enhanced by Zemanta

Tags: , , , ,

Page 1 of 3123