Blog

What business are you/we in? Classic advice from Theodore Levitt essays

Theodore Levit was born in Germany. He published his famous article Marketing Myopia in 1960. Still more then valid today in 2011.

What business’ are railroads in? In a railroad business? No. In a transportation business. It is very important to define your business correctly. Otherwise other will take your customer away. I guess because railroads do not understand that in full degree they are more often than not in trouble. And this claim is still valid no mater what new technologies or products/services arrive.

How to approach to the definition of your business?

First realizing that company’s most precious assets is its relationship with its customers. “What matters is not whom you know but how you are known to them.”

Second: if you are lucky enough that your business is in expanding market you should be aware of absence of thinking on defining your business. In either case you should always think how to expand the market of your business. Seeing that as a problem is great because if “thinking is an intellectual response to a problem, then the absence of a problem leads to the absence of thinking. “. So, management must not think of itself as merely providing products and/or services but as providing customer-creating value satisfaction.

Third. What does that mean for my specialized B2B design business? Specializing in integrated corporate reports design is only one side of this business. Corporate reporting has some similar touch points as publishing in general. But it is also specific. It is consisted of:

  • audit or compliance with some standards. Financial standards are well known. Other, such as Global Reporting Initiative are yet to be widely accepted.
  • design including the redaction of the content. This is the part that my company is able to cover well, as classical publication and completely as online presentation.
  • publishing itself. Also very interesting point, especially because there is a growing interest not only in annual but also in corporate social responsibility (CSR) and sustainability reports.

So, service provider who will be able to cover all three aspects of reporting business will be the winner of the future. In my opinion.

Last but not least. If you are advertising agency. What business are you in? Advertising? No! As well presented in a cartoon by DDB, you are in de-commodification business.

Illustration from ddb.com on what business is advertising agenncy in?

Illustration by ddb.com

Source: What Business Are You In?: Classic Advice from Theodore Levitt by Theodore Levitt 1 pages. Publication date: Oct 01, 2006

Tags: , , , ,

About the book: Funky Business Forever. How to enjoy capitalism.

Funky Business Forever: How To Enjoy CapitalismFunky Business Forever: How To Enjoy Capitalism by Kjell Nordstrom

My rating: 5 of 5 stars

Funky Business Forever. How to enjoy capitalism. Third edition published in 2008.

This book primarily aims at leaders. But I guess it is going to be very interesting reading for all others who work in business too (because we can’t be all leaders, right?). And maybe this book will be of interest to all of you who like to follow new phenomenas in modern economies and societies in general. Believe me there is plenty of advice for everybody and especially for all of us who are making our own money for living. Be that in your own company or in the multinational corporation or in public organization for which you work for.

The fact is that 12.5 years is a life expectancy of all firms in Europe and Japan. So, to discover the fountain of youth for your organization you should focus on human community inside and outside your company rather than on profits and bottom line.

Mission of this book, for which it is really hard to say that it is only a business book, is to: “make a difference in shaping organizations and leaders who consider broader responsibilities than the balance sheet.”. You will find some incredebly funny or better to say funky statements. If you have finished an MBA, that means only that you (or in that case me, myself and I) are Mediocre But Arrogant (MBA). So read this book or maybe this review if you want to find out why an MBA in todays (business) environment is just not enough.

Todays new phenomenas are described in more details in the book. To me it was interesting to read the opinion about phenomena #11: Interactive everything. Besides new phenomenas authors also claim that technology opens up more markets and more things than ever before to total transparency and increased globalisation. There is a claim that we need to realise that technological development necessitates changes in our institutions and in our values. Technology. Institutions. Values.

So, but what is the most important concern every big company (or for that sake, every company) should have? The fact is that 12.5 years is a life expectancy of all firms in Europe and Japan. And as much as one-third of 1970′s Fortune 500 companies had disappeared by 1983. (de Geus) So, to discover the fountain of youth for your organization you should focus on human community inside and outside your company rather than on profits and bottom line. That kind of company is so called Funky Inc.

In Funky Inc. people work smarter. They do what they are really good at, maybe 100 times better. In another words: the more unique you are – the better you will do.

Authors describe Funky Inc. in depth and I would also like to share with you some interesting details. We are all more or less in so called knowledge society/economy. And a combination of fun and fear drives knowledge workers to 80-hour work week. The distinction between learning, working and living is gone – it is one and the same thing. But funky people in Funky Inc. work smarter. They do what they are really good at, maybe 100 times better. Period. In another words: the more unique you are – the better you will do.

Funky organizations do not aspire to be everything for everyone. Instead, they try to become something for someone. This focus has three elements:

+ Narrow Focus (NF)
+ Hollow Focus (HF)
+ Targeted Focus (TF)

NF = only the best is good enough.
HF = competing based on core competence and compents, the people who make things happen. But remember that your psychological capital (confidence, hope, optimism and resilence) is more important than your intellectual capital (education and experience).
TF = find riches in niches.

Worth remembering is that great organisations are based on fantasy, feelings and faith. To achieve that you need intellectual capital + psychological capital + social kapital.

Funky Inc. also thrives on variation, difference and diversity. C (creativity) = D (diversity)2. More diversity means more standard deviation. Variation => if many of your customers are imigrants or young or old or women, this should be reflected in the make-up of the organzation; this is so called an eve-olution. Frozen creativity means that we get an idea (gas); then start discussing it with others (fluid); and finally develop a customer offering (solid). So, remember that no one can have a monopoly on creativity – not even a momentary one – not even Microsoft or Google. Managing across borders that you could find funky is in European firms such as: Phillips, Electrolux, Nokia, Heineken, Unilever, TetraPak, Nestlé rather than companies as Wall-Mart or Mitsubishi.

To build up your funky organization you should focus, focus, focus and then go global. In your communications and in your believes you should reffer to niches rather than temporary monopolies – though the meaning is exactly the same. Vision of your organisation should be clear, continuous and consistent. It should inspire commitment and be continually communicated. Funky leaders communicate, then communicate the same thing againg, and again, and again (this is one particular thing I should really remember). The true leaders are CSOs – Chief Storrytelling Officers. Four critical requirements of funky leaders will arise: increased calls for direction and tolerance, attraction and attention. And in all companies they should understand that intelligence is normaly distributed. It is not the preserve of white, 45-year-old males.

In funky companies sharing includes: ownership, rewards, identity, culture, knowledge, attitudes; the choice is endless, actually. But the trick is in keeping one thing constant while at the same time you allow for variation in all other dimensions. Funky Inc. learns from chinese economy which is built on the conept of trust – Guanxi – a strong and inexpensive substitute for contracts and lawyers. To achieve a funky oraganization you most have the gifts and guts to imagine and work wonders. All this implies risk – total risk – and, at the end of the day, personal risk. Yes, personal risk. When you wake up next day remember yourself that business is not a rocket science. It basicaly still boils down to making money. Also in Funky Inc.

If we look back, we could realise that since the fall of the Berlin Wall we have the Capitalism über alles. The nation state is stucked. To small to make an impact on the big issues and too big to make an impact on the small issues.

What about phenomenas in society more in general? If we look back, we could realise that since the fall of the Berlin Wall we have the Capitalism über alles. And in the 21 century instead of 500 TV channels, we now have millinons of websites. (Time magazine) Family became a luxury item… For many of us the de facto standard is already serial monogamy, threesomes, etc. The nation state is stucked. To small to make an impact on the big issues and too big to make an impact on the small issues. The dominant ism left on earth is individualism. We have become wandering vagabonds in search of who knows what.

The fact is that rich are getting richer and the poor poorer. We are on the way toward a 2/3 type of society in which a large proportion of people are constantly loosing ground. Parents from young people had a stedy job in their times in a big organisation where you got a gold watch and a pat on the back after 40 years of loyal service. Old societies were geographically structured and so were the tribes. We had the Sydney tribe, the Stuttgart tribe and the Stockholm tribe. And today? What is today’s way to progress?

Wealth is not gained by perfecting the known. Innovation conerns every little asspect of how an organisation or a society for that matter operates – administrative innovations, marketing innovations, financial innovations, HRM innovations and service concept innovations. Europe’s advantage is supposed to be: diversity because it is the mother of creativity, invention and progress at the end. Todays reality is that employees education isn’t growing 100 per cent faster than academia, but 100 times or 10.000 per cent faster. So academia and the whole educational system will have to adapt, I guess.

For the end of this review three other interesting details to me:
1.
The most staggering thing is that in a world on real-time society, companies keep on publishing Annual Reports. The balance sheets are about atoms – machines, buildings, etc. – but do companies that way really capture the most critical assets by measuring that stuff?
2.
Can you tell a bank from an insurance company? They basically provide the same kind of service. My experience exatly. Even more, who needs a bank anymore today?
3.
The key to increase internal leverage is not knowledge management but rather knowledgeble management. So how do you implement that in a small design boutique? My challenge for the future.

I hope you enjoyed my review. Let me know what do you think in comments or on twitter: marko_savic_. Go Funky.

View all my reviews

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Two speeches/presentations at the Germany meets Slovenia forum at Institute for Cultural Diplomacy

I was kindly invited by the Institute for Cultural Diplomacy to the Germany Meets Slovenia: A Forum for Young Leaders. The principal focus of “Germany Meets Slovenia: A Forum for Young Leaders” is to develop both a real and a virtual network of young leaders committed to building and sustaining lasting ties between Germany and Slovenia in the fields of politics, academia, science, media, business and culture, thereby strengthening the bilateral relationship.

I had two speeches/presentations. The first topic presented was: Who needs design strategies? Design or economy?. Feel free to take a look/download/email/share the presentation below. If you like it, let me know.

Second presentation was on 365interactive design system for annual reports. Both speeches were received really well. With a lot of questions. The most interesting question I received was: “What is an annual report?”.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

About the Kristina Halvorson’s book: Content Strategy for the Web

Content Strategy for the Web (Voices That Matter)Content Strategy for the Web by Kristina Halvorson

My rating: 4 of 5 stars

The most important thing I realised, when I read this book is:
You are on the web => You are publisher.

Well the author said that if you or your organization has a web site, then you are a publisher but I guess my claim could also hold in this web 2.0 times (or are we already 3.0?). One other thing to keep in mind is that this is not a book about web writing. It’s about content strategy – for the web.

Content strategy consists of: + creation, + delivery, + governance.

This book more specifically deals with:
+ how to plan the content strategy;
+ how to create a content but don’t expect to learn how to write for your web site;
+ governing the content.

The whole book is written with the presumption that you/your organization is already on the web or has a web site. Which seems like a must today for everybody. So if we follow the most important thing to remember from this book, about being a publisher, this means that everybody today already is a publisher. I guess that’s not far away from the facts. And if you are a publisher and want to be successful publisher, you need a content strategy. This book definitely helped me to rethink my own blog and about my company’s web content.

If I already talk about a web site, to me it was interesting to realize, that a mid-sized web site was one that has 200 to 1.200 pages. And inside such a web site for example it is pretty straightforward clear that you should develop your linking strategy. Or will you use automated linking service like Zemanta, for example?

When delivering content, we have options to choose between:
+ original content,
+ aggregated content,
+ co-created content,
+ licensed content,
+ user-generated content.

And I was impressed to realise how many people profiles could actually be engaged in content creation. The list of profiles is:
+ content requesters,
+ content providers,
+ content creators,
+ content reviewers,
+ content approvers,
+ content publisher.

And if it that is not enough, once your web site is live you could need profiles like:
+ web editor-in-chief,
+ web editor,
+ web writer,
+ search engine optimization strategist,
+ reviewers and approvers.

From the numerous profiles above it is clear that copy is not content. In content creation there are numerous profiles involved. And author goes further in claiming that user experience (UX) design is not the answer to a successful web site but the collaboration across disciplines. That, in my opinion is the reason why this is not such an easy task, actually.

Content strategy vs. brand strategy?
+ Content strategy is not about the talk.
+ Content strategy is about how you walk the talk.
+ Messages from your brand strategy are not content.

For some professional, be that marketing, communications or other it might be interesting to realise where content strategy stand when compared to brand strategy. Well content strategy is not about the talk. It’s about how you walk the talk. And messages from your brand strategy are not your content.

Take your social media efforts like a commitment not like a campaign. So, stop thinking “launch”. Start thinking “life-cycle”.

There is one other news to have in mind when you have a web site. Your content is never really finished. Sorry, says author of this book, Kristina Halvorson. And one other piece of advice. Take your social media efforts like a commitment not like a campaign. So, stop thinking “launch”. Start thinking “life-cycle”. I couldn’t agree more.

And for almost a gig like me it was interesting to see two diagrams. One is: How to measure content effectiveness? Diagram was developed at the Content Delivery & Analysis Ltd:
Diagram on content effectiveness

Content is not a feature. It should be noticed that content needs ongoing care and feeding. Web content is never actually really finished.

For the end of this review only one remark from the author. If your are some kind of web professional, you probably saw a diagram the Elements of user experience. Well I didn’t. And the author recommends to not think of content as a feature as maybe it could be said from this diagram, originally developed by Jesse James Garrett.
description

View all my reviews

Enhanced by Zemanta

Tags: , , ,

Why would you use Vizuarna’s 365i? Posts series.

We are publishing a special posts series explaining Why would you use 365i? Please feel free to browse or listen to the posts.

Why would you use Vizuarna’s 365i? Posts series.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Why would you use 365i? Because it has the highest level of security assured for you interactive annual report

This is the post series, explaining Why would you use 365i? In the fourth part I’m explaining why you have the highest level of security assured by using a 365i for you interactive annual report.

If you are are a listener rather than a reader, use the audio post: Why use 365i? Because you have the highest level of security assured: Post series 4 (.mp3; 1,1 MB)

Why would you use 365i? Because it has the highest level of security assured for you interactive annual report.

Do you worry about security in a digital world? Using 365i for your interactive annual report offers you the highest security performance possible, just the same as if you would publish a .pdf document. 365i means you don’t have to worry about the security of your annual report’s data, nor its content.

The original version of your interactive annual report we publish on your corporate website and install on your server is untouchable. It is not possible for any third person to interrupt or transform the content in any way. 365i also provides its own server, to ensure you have on-line backup at all times. Or to host your report.

Illustration presenting why 365i assures the highest level of security

Jasna Andrić/Vizuarna

height]600[/height]
By using 365i you get a tool installed directly to the computer of your choice. This computers of your does not have to meet any special demands, besides the operating system. And you need the internet connection only to update the content of your interactive annual report. You get the tool to use as your rent.

Audio post: Why use 365i? Because you have the highest level of security assured: Post series 4 (.mp3; 1,1 MB)

Source:
5. The highest level of security assured.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Tags: , , , , ,

Why would you use 365i? Because it is a design tool worth twelve times more than it costs

This is the post series, explaining Why would you use 365i? In the second part I’m explaining why is a design tool 365i worth twelve times mores than it costs.

If you are are a listener rather than a reader, use the audio post: Why use 365i? Design tool worth twelve times more than it costs: Post series 2 (.mp3; 2,4 MB)

Why would you use 365i? Because it is a design tool worth twelve times more than it costs.

Costs are always important when you are deciding what to do whit your budget. There is always a risk when buying a system solution because you do not know if it is going to fit for the next couple of years as it is promised. In the case of interactive annual report the first decision to be made is: will you go interactive completely or is your interactive annual report just a supplement of your printed version. The savings are biggest when you decide to go interactive completely.

Are the production costs of developing a system tool for your interactive annual report to high for you? We have a design tool for you worth twelve times more than it costs.

Vizuarna’s 365i design tool enables you both. Cost savings and still the possibility given to every user of your interactive annual report to print his own annual report, be that in whole or by chapters. But the production of the real interactive annual report (by which I do not mean just the .pdf file) that features at least a:

  • micro-site of your annual report with complete export to the USB keys, DVDs…
  • .pdf downloads of the whole or parts of your annual report
  • possibility to download or send from the system all financial spread sheets

would ten times and more increase the costs or your usual budget for your annual report. At least if you would try to build a system.

Did I mention design? No, but you have already designed your annual report up until now aren’t you? So, the costs are too high. Will you leave a production of your interactive annual report aside? Because costs of production of such a system are too high for you? We have a solution.

An illustration explaining Why would you use 365i? Because it is a design tool worth 12 times more than it costs

Vizuarna/Jasna Andrić

Are you looking for the best deal for your interactive annual report? With Vizuarna’s 365i you get a design tool worth more than €240,000 for the price of €20,000. How is that possible? We have developed 365i with financial support from the Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Technology of the Republic of Slovenia, European Union resources and finance grants from the Slovene Enterprise Fund.

We put together a professional team devoted to bringing the idea to fruition. It includes an information architect, a design manager and managing director, a creative director, a head of development, programmers, an art director, designers and a copywriter. The team has achieved its goal, and can now offer you this design tool and service for less than €20,000.

365i can cover your interactive annual report needs with the design tool of the future.

Audio post: Why use 365i? Design tool worth twelve times more than it costs: Post series 2 (.mp3; 2,4 MB)

Source:
Why use 365i? 7. A design tool worth twelve times more than it costs.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Tags: , , , , , ,

Why would you use 365i? Because it enables you the multimedia presentation of your business year in your interactive annual report

This is the post series, explaining Why would you use 365i? In the first part I’m explaining the multimedia presentation of a business year in your interactive annual report.

If you are are a listener rather than a reader, use the audio post: Why use 365i? Multimedia presentation of your business year: Post series 1 (.mp3; 1,8 MB, 2:31 minutes)

Why would you use 365i? Because it enables you the multimedia presentation of your business year in your interactive annual report.

Illustration presenting Why would you use 365i design tool as a multimedia presentation of a business year

Vizuarna/Jasna Andrić

In the “reporting business” companies around the world faced many changes in recent years. There was a tremendous pressure in large capital markets to the disclosure of quarterly reports. The recession time seems to loosen that pressure. But the fact remains: the times of a once a year annual speeches to the stakeholders of your company in your annual report are forever gone. Bigger transparency is a fact nobody can deny.

And while we are all familiar with our emotional connections to the paper, and while some research also suggests that “greater emotional processing is facilitated by the physical material than the virtual” there is no doubt that transparency possibilities of your interactive annual report are prevailing. Assuring a “physical material” of your interactive annual report is also just a welcomed creative challenge to the team of Vizuarna’s 365i.

Using Vizuarna’s 356i offers almost unlimited possibilities of including your audio and video content to your interactive annual report. This is the way to add to the level of your communications, strengthen your corporate identity and enhance the transparency of your reporting.

Your interactive annual report design by our team with the help of the design tool 365i enables not just photography or illustration that are important part of the content of your report but bring alive the results and milestones of the business year for your reporting users. Using Vizuarna’s 356i offers almost unlimited possibilities of including your audio and video content to your interactive annual report. With corporate videos, TV commercials, radio advertisements, banners, computer games, photo galleries, videos from events and more, you will:

  • add to the level of your communications,
  • to the strength of your corporate identity, and
  • enhance the transparency of your reporting.

Audio post: Why use 365i? Multimedia presentation of your business year: Post series 1 (.mp3; 1,8 MB; 2:31 minutes)

Sources:
Why use 365i? 8. Multimedia presentation of business year.
MillwardBrown_CaseStudy_Neuroscience.pdf (645 KB)

Tags: , , ,

Google and the future of the news industry

There are no big solutions to save the news industry as we knew it. On the paper, namely. And although Google is the corporation that dominates the online-advertising today, this same Google claimes that there is much more online-ad money to be picked up by news organization. This are one of the conclusions by James Fallows in The Atlantic magazine from June 2010 in an article How to Save the News.

For me, it was interesting to read about:
+ the differences between Google and news industry,
+ triple whammy claim from the Google’s CEO Eric Schmidt, and
+ bundling case of the Google today and newspaper industry today and in the past.

The differences between Google and news industry

The scheme explaining the differences between Google and the news industry

Scheme: Marko Savić from James Fallows, How to Save the News, the Atlantic

Google is wildly successful, collectively cocky, engineer-dominated, very internationally staffed West Coast tech start-up. The news industry from the point of view in the USA is: East Coast-centric, liberal arts-heavy, less international in staff and leadership, dominated by organizations founded in the distant past and strikingly downcast and even panicked at the moment.  At Google everybody is supposed to believe that that consumers are willing to spend time with printed, online and on-air products from the news industry, however much they cots. And people from the news industry doubt heavily if consumers are ever going to be willing to pay for online news. Time will show, but changes are on the way, definitely.

The triple whammy from Eric Schmidt

Scheme explaining the triple whammy from Eric Schmidt, Google CEO

Scheme: Marko Savić from James Fallows, How to Save the News, the Atlantic

Jammes Falloows familiy and Eric Scmidts family happened to be friends. For the purposes of the published article Google’s CEO was also interviewed. Eric Scmidt said in that interview that we are dealing with the triple whammy in the print:
+ loss of classifieds,
+ loss of circulation, and
+ loss of display ads in print, on a per-ad basis.
More on the subject in the Google-eye View of the Newspaper Business.

Unbundling

Scheme presenting the unbundling problem of the newspapers

Scheme: Marko Savić from James Fallows, How to Save the News, the Atlantic

The newspapers always knew that serious reporting from, let’s say Afganistan can never be profitable. But the automotive sections, real-estate, home-and-garden, travel, and/or technology have always found their advertisers. On the other hand Google is the most powerful unbudling agent of all, since it is leting the users find exactly the article they were looking for. But in my opinion Google also became the bundler of its many services but only one being really profitable: the advertising. We will see how long will Google’s model be sustainable.

The solution for the future of the news industry? New on-line news business model.

Scheme presenting new online business model

Scheme: Marko Savić from James Fallows, How to Save the News, the Atlantic

Three parts of the proposed new on-line news business model:
+ distribution: getting news to more people & more people to news oriented sites,
+ engagement: making the presentation of news more interesting, and
+ monetization: converting these larger audiences and more strongly committed audiences into revenue trough both subscription fees and ads,
calls in each area for Google’s expertise. And the news industry should be able to make the news business profitable by them selves. Google is offering support though. This support is actually part of Google’s corporate culture, namely:
+ Permanent beta & continuous experimentation: learning what does work by seeing all the things that don’t.
+ Small steps to make surprisingly large difference: nothing will work but everything might.

And for the end the most funny part of the article, about the newspapers business model:
“If you were starting from scratch, you could never possibly justify this business model,” Hal Varian said, in a variation on a familiar tech-world riff about the print-journalism business. “Grow trees—then grind them up, and truck big rolls of paper down from Canada? Then run them through enormously expensive machinery, hand-deliver them overnight to thousands of doorsteps, and leave more on newsstands, where the surplus is out of date immediately and must be thrown away? Who would say that made sense?”

Source: Fallows, James: How to Save the News in the Atlantic, june 2010

Enhanced by Zemanta

Tags: ,

“We think that our job is to take responsibility for the complete user experience”, Steve Jobs

That is what we had in mind when developing Vizuarna’s 365i, a design tool for interactive annual reports. Taking the responsibility for the complete product.

The photo portret of Steve Jobs

Interactive annual reporting is a fact. The client needs to have a solution that will enable him not only a professional interactive report but also a possibility that the user groups will find the information they want. Annual reporting of the corporation has a complex content, be that describing the business milestones or presenting the rich info-graphics of the annual or presenting the financial results in the balance sheet, income statement and its disclosure’s. This is why Vizuarna’s 365i design tool enables to automate on screen presentation of the annual report and at the same time enabling standard user search experience. And on the other hand we did not forget that .pdf publication of the annual reports are still de facto standard, so the design tool enables to automate that part too.

Maybe we were lucky (or maybe smart) enough not to develop another flash flip book application. Really early in the process of idea testing, one of our first clients said: “But, hey guys, I do not want you to make me another like interactive book, with this buttons to move on. I do not want that.”. And yes, we didn’t developed that. The 365i enables complete standard user search experience.

Technically, it is based on .xml standard that is totality compliant with the .xbrl standard of the Securities and Exchange Commission from the USA. Even more deeply, the tool makes every object in the report known, be that a paragraph, various titles, graphs or other pie charts, or numbers in income statements of your profit line. All that in accordance with the corporate identity of the corporation. What that means? That by default user are able to find what they want. How? Usually by goggling, as we all have to admit.

We did not forget the processionals who use the annual reports as part of their job. We found out that financial departments are sending to bank annalists their own spreadsheets. Independently from the designed official annual report. The 365i enables to group all the spreadsheets (and that spreadsheets that are designed in accordance with the corporate identity) or only some of them. All the spreadsheets may also be published in the Download Centre, naturally locked in. But no need to look for the files and compiling them together when your CEO bumps into your office to send all the figures to some new important potential investor. With one click you choose all the spreadsheets and send them to appropriate address. And be sure that those spreadsheet are all following your corporate design guidelines so the corporate communications manager will be happy too (not to mention your in-house design department).

Steve Jobs also said in one other occasion: “Learning about serif and san-serif typefaces and varying the amount of space between letter combinations… all came back to me, and we designed it all into Mac. It was the first computer with beautiful typography”.  Similarly, we believe that 365i is the first design tool for complete interactive reporting enabling beautiful interactive annual reports.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Page 1 of 11